Alongside country level data on modern slavery, the 2018 Global Slavery Index includes studies on specific countries. This year, we’ve focused on the top 12 global economies, providing information on the types of modern slavery and vulnerability factors affecting each of these countries, as well as the actions of the government. Each country study includes data on the greatest value imports at risk of being produced through forced labour as well as information on the statements being produced under the UK Modern Slavery Act. The studies conclude with a series of policy recommendations.
140/167Prevalence Index Rank
Norway
9,000Estimated number of people living in modern slavery
1.81/1000Estimated proportion of population living in modern slavery
4.51/100Vulnerability to modern slavery
BBBGovernment response rating
5,199,836Population
$59,385GDP (PPP)
Government Response
Milestone 1Survivors of slavery are identified and supported to exit and remain out of modern slavery
IndicatorRating
1.1.1National campaigns provide information to members of the public on how to report and identify victims 0
Campaigns on how to identify OR report potential victims, such as promotion of a hotline, website, or text messaging details, or distributing indicators of modern slavery
AND must be distributed to the public at the NATIONAL level.
NOT training for government officials, NGOs, embassy staff, health, and social workers AND occurred once since 30 June 2012.
NOT general awareness campaigns that do not mention hotline or indicators of trafficking.
NOT information is distributed to at-risk or specific populations or geographic locations, such as migrant workers or at-risk communities – this is covered under Milestone 4, 1.2.1.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – evident that some campaigns have been held in 2016, but not clear within reporting period and that these campaigns publicise how to report
1.1.2These campaigns are distributed systematically and at regular intervals (as distinct from one-off, isolated)0
If yes to 1.1.1, information has been distributed annually since 30 June 2012
OR information is promoted regularly through social media
AND there is evidence this online promotion has been regularly updated (at least once since 1 February 2016 – please refer to date of Facebook posts, or date of tweets, etc.).
If no to 1.1.1, indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – public information campaigns have not included how to report and identify victims
1.1.3There has been an increase in reported cases of modern slavery from the public 0
If yes to 1.1.1, there has been an increase in public reports of modern slavery cases in recent years
AND this increase in reports is related to the campaign
OR has occurred since campaign information has been distributed to the public
AND this must have occurred since 30 June 2012.
If no to 1.1.1, indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – campaigns have not included how to report and identify victims
2.1.1There is a reporting mechanism, such as a hotline1
Reporting mechanism exists whereby modern slavery crimes can be reported (either in isolation or as part of a larger phone service).
This includes text messaging, an online form, or phone hotline
AND this reporting mechanism must be operational between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
If there are multiple hotlines covering different populations, please rate as indicator met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- a trafficking hotline exists- 22 33 11 60, run by ROSA
2.1.2Reporting mechanism is available for men, women, and children1
If yes to 2.1.1, this reporting mechanism is available for men, women, and children to report cases of modern slavery
OR there are separate hotlines that cover men, women, and children. NOT a single hotline exists where women or children can report, but nowhere for men to report exploitation.
Please refer to the most relevant reporting mechanism identified in 2.1.1 for indicators 2.1.2 through to 2.1.5.
A modern slavery/trafficking hotline would be most relevant, followed by multiple hotlines that cover all sub-populations (e.g. for women and/or children).
If multiple hotlines exist covering all sub- populations, please rate as indicator met. If some populations are not covered, please rate as indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met – since 2016, the hotline covers all victims
2.1.3Reporting mechanism is free of charge to access0
If yes to 2.1.1, this reporting mechanism is free to access.
If no to 2.1.1, indicator not met.
Please refer to the most relevant reporting mechanism identified in 2.1.1 for indicators 2.1.2 through to 2.1.5.
Modern slavery/trafficking hotline would be most relevant, followed by those which cover trafficked sub-populations (e.g. for women and/or children).
If multiple hotlines exist covering different populations and all are free of charge, please rate as indicator met. If some of the available and relevant hotlines are not free of charge, please rate as indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – unclear if the hotline is free to access
2.1.4Reporting mechanism operates 24/71
If yes to 2.1.1, this reporting mechanism operates 24/7.
If no to 2.1.1, indicator not met.
Please refer to the most relevant reporting mechanism identified in 2.1.1 for indicators 2.1.2 through to 2.1.5.
Modern slavery/trafficking hotline would be most relevant, followed by those that cover trafficked sub-populations (e.g. for women and/or children).
If multiple hotlines exist covering different populations and all are available 24/7, please rate as indicator met. If some hotlines are not available 24/7, please rate as indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- the hotline is available 24/7
2.1.5The reporting mechanism operates in multiple languages or has capacity to provide immediate access to translators1
If yes to 2.1.1, this reporting mechanism operates in multiple languages, or brings in translators as necessary.
If no to 2.1.1, indicator not met.
Please refer to the most relevant reporting mechanism identified in 2.1.1 for indicators 2.1.2 through to 2.1.5.
Modern slavery/trafficking hotline would be most relevant, followed by those which cover trafficked sub-populations (e.g. for women and/or children).
If multiple hotlines exist covering different populations and all are available in multiple languages, please rate as indicator met. If some hotlines are not available in multiple languages, please rate as indicator not met.
Multiple languages means national language + at least one other language.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- the hotline operates in multiple languages
2.2.1Training on basic legal frameworks and victim identification has been carried out for front line “general duties” police1
Training for front line police has taken place on basic legal frameworks surrounding modern slavery AND victim identification
AND training for police has occurred once since 30 June 2012.
Definition of training includes formal in-person training as part of broader curriculum on human rights or other training programs, or part of an online training program.
Training can be provided by INGOs with government support (support defined as permission, development of the training, or monetary or in-kind support).
NOT training manuals have been developed by INGOs, NGOs.
NOT booklets with indicators of trafficking have been handed out to police.
NOT training for immigration, border guards, or labour inspectors.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- police are provided with training on how to identify victims since 2012
2.2.4NegativeThere is evidence that police officers have not identified victims of modern slavery0
If yes to 2.2.1, but police officers have not identified any victims of modern slavery between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
If no to 2.2.1, indicator not met.
This indicator is specifically asking if police who have received training have identified victims. Mark as “indicator met” where there has been a failure to identify victims post-training for police. If evidence suggests that victims have not been identified, but no training has occurred, please mark as “indicator not met.” If the body identifying victims is not specified as “police,” government can be used as a proxy.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – no information found within the relevant period
2.3.1Training on how to identify victims of modern slavery is provided to officials with front line regulatory bodies likely to be “first responders”1
Training covers indicators of modern slavery and how to refer individuals
AND training is formal face-to-face or online modules
AND training is provided to one or more of the following: border guards, immigration officials, labour inspectors
AND training has been provided once since 30 June 2012.
Training can be provided by INGOs with government support (support defined as permission, development of the training, or monetary or in-kind support).
NOT leaflets have been distributed to labour inspectors or posters have been put up in airports on how to identify/report victims.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- training has been carried out for immigration staff since 2012
2.3.2Training on how to identify victims of modern slavery is provided to non-regulatory workers likely to be “first responders”1
Training covers indicators of modern slavery and how to refer individuals
AND training is formal face-to-face or online modules
AND training is provided to one or more of the following: for teachers, doctors, nurses, social workers, tourism sector workers (including private tourism operators)
AND training has been provided once since 30 June 2012.
Training can be provided by INGOs with government support (support defined as permission, development of the training, or monetary or in-kind support).
NOT leaflets on how to identify/report victims have been distributed to tour guides or posters put up in doctors surgeries.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- training has been provided for staff who work with asylum seekers, medical staff and child welfare service since 2012
2.3.3Training for first responders is delivered systematically and at regular intervals (as distinct from one-off, isolated)1
If yes to 2.3.1 OR 2.3.2, training is delivered at least every two years to at least one of the members of the above groups (labour inspectors, border guards, immigration officials, doctors, nurses, teachers, social workers, tourism sector workers) since 30 June 2012
AND training has been delivered to a significant proportion of these groups.
OR yes to 2.3.1 AND 2.3.2 and training is delivered at least every two years to BOTH of these groups.
NOT training has been delivered to each of these groups once since 2012.
If no to 2.3.1 AND 2.3.2, then indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- training is carried out for two groups (immigration/border officials and reception centre staff) in 2012, 2013 and 2016. There are still calls for more training from GRETA
3.1.1Victim support services are available for some suspected victims of modern slavery (men, women, and children where relevant) 1
Any kind of victim support service is available for men, women, or children
AND services must be government run, or funded by government, or provided with in-kind support from the government
AND services must be operational between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
NOT INGOs run a shelter without any government support. (Support defined as permission, development of the training, or monetary or in-kind support.)
Researcher NotesIndicator met- services are available for victims of modern slavery
3.1.2NegativeSuspected victims are held in shelters against their will and do not have a choice about whether or not to remain in a shelter0
If yes to 3.1.1, adult victims are unable to leave a shelter or safe house when they wish (or are unable to leave without a chaperone). Children must also be able to leave when they wish but should be accompanied by a chaperone. If evidence that victims (adults and children) are detained against their will or are unable to leave unaccompanied (adults) or with a chaperone (children), this meets the criteria of the indicator. If no to 3.1.1, not met this indicator.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – no evidence that victims are held against their will
3.1.3Government contributes to the operational costs of the shelters and there are no significant resource gaps1
If yes to 3.1.1, government provides support to the shelters. Support defined as in-kind or monetary support (not just permission).
NOT INGO funds and runs a shelter or safe house.
If no to 3.1.1, not met indicator.
If government provides some resources, but there are significant gaps not covered by INGOs or government, then please rate as indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- NGOs providing services have been funded by the government
3.1.4Physical and mental health services are provided to victims of modern slavery1
If yes to 3.1.1, there is evidence of some physical AND mental health support for victims of modern slavery since 30 June 2012.
If no to 3.1.1., not met indicator.
If government provides some physical and mental health support, but there are significant gaps not covered by INGOs or government, then please rate as indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- physical and mental health services are provided, however there are difficulties in accessing these tied to availability of ID cards. Recent steps have been taken to improve this process
3.1.5NegativeVictim support services are not available for all victims of modern slavery0
If yes to 3.1.1 AND there have been identified modern slavery cases of men, women, children, or relevant groups such as foreign victims, forced labour victims, victims of commercial sexual exploitation, etc.) AND there are NO specific shelters or services for them.
This has also occurred between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
NOT services are not available for a particular group, but no cases within that group were identified.
This indicator is measuring gaps in existing services.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – services are available for men, women and children, although there are gaps in the support provided to men
3.1.7NegativeNo victims have accessed the services or shelters0
If yes to 3.1.1, despite availability of services, victims have not accessed them
AND this has occurred between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017. Examples include cases where facilities exist but victims are not being transferred to these facilities.
This indicator is measuring the use of existing services.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- services have been provided since June 2014
3.2.1Services provide long-term reintegration support1
If yes to 3.1.1, long-term reintegration is defined as evidence of financial support, provision of housing, job training and/or placement, or receipt of social welfare, or provision of education for victims of modern slavery
AND there is evidence that this has been provided between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
If no to 3.1.1, indicator not met.
NOT visas are available for victims – this is covered under Milestone 1, 3.2.2.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- various government funded NGOs provide long term support to victims, including access to financial support and welfare services
3.2.2Measures are in place to address the migration situation of victims who want to remain or be resettled1
Visas are available so that foreign victims can receive support either in country or in a third country after a reflection period has expired
AND these are available between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
Note: not dependent on 3.1.1.
These visas include longer term visas AND reflection periods awarded on the basis of personal situation OR participation in a court case.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- options to remain are available for those who participate with the criminal justice system or through claiming as an asylum seeker
3.2.3Services are child friendly1
If yes to 3.1.1, children have specialised services, separate shelters, or are given some kind of special support (NOT including support in the criminal justice system)
AND this has occurred since 30 June 2012.
If no to 3.1.1, indicator not met.
NOT children are placed in correctional facilities, boarding schools, or other non-specialised institutions
Researcher NotesIndicator met- specialised care available for child victims through the Child Welfare Service since 2012
3.2.4Victims are assisted to make contact with their family or contact person of choice1
If yes to 3.1.1, victims are assisted to make contact with families by the government
OR there is a family reunification program
AND this is operating between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
NOT family reunification program exists but is not currently funded.
NOT INGOs operate a family reunification program without government support.
If no to 3.1.1, not met this indicator.
Researcher NotesIndicator met – children are reunited with their families where this is appropriate
3.3.1Training has been carried out for all staff providing direct victim assistance services1
If yes to 3.1.1, evidence of any training for those who provide direct victim support services.
This training includes how to assist victims of modern slavery and can include do no harm principles, individualised treatment and care, comprehensive care, self-determination and participation, non-discrimination, confidentiality, and right to privacy
OR direct assistance is provided by fully qualified social workers, psychologists, or doctors
AND this has occurred since 30 June 2012.
Training can be provided by INGOs with government support (support defined as permission, development of the training, or monetary or in-kind support).
NOT training is provided by unskilled volunteers.
If no to 3.1.1, not met this indicator.
NOT general modern slavery training is provided to social workers.
Direct victim assistance services means those services provided to workers who have regular contact with victims post-identification. It can include shelter workers, case managers, doctors, and psychologists.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- ROSA provides regular training to staff providing services. It is funded by the government
3.3.2Direct victim assistance services have been evaluated1
If yes to 3.1.1, evidence of formal reporting or evaluation of direct victim support services has been undertaken
AND this has occurred at least once since 30 June 2012.
Evaluation (internal or external) is defined as an assessment of the current services against the service objectives and incorporating client feedback.
NOT a description of the program or services provided.
NOT ad hoc inspections without a clear sense of follow-up activities.
NOT evaluations of the national action plan – this is covered under Milestone 3, 2.1.1.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- support services have been evaluated since 2012, including a review of the reflection period
3.3.3Evaluations of services have been provided to the National Referral Mechanism or coordinating referral body0
If yes to 3.3.2, a report of these evaluations has been made to the National Referral Mechanism or coordinating referral body to inform future assistance programming
AND this has occurred once since 30 June 2012.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- no information found
4.1.1The government has clear national guidelines for identifying and screening victims for all first responders1
National general guidelines exist for identification AND screening of victims
AND have been distributed to all first responders
AND this has occurred since 30 June 2012.
First responders are defined as: immigration, border patrol, labour inspectors, NGOs, teachers, social workers, doctors, nurses, and the tourism industry.
General guidelines should exist at the national level for all responders, NOT police have their own guidelines.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- guidelines exist to support identification of victims and have been distributed to officers and service providers since 2012
4.1.2The guidelines make provision for a category of “presumed victims” who can be provided with services until a formal determination is made1
If yes to 4.1.1, guidelines include provisions so victims who have not yet been assessed to be victims of modern slavery can still receive services.
If no to 4.1.1, indicator not met.
Examples include “presumed” categories within guidelines or “informal” assistance given to victims while determination is made.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- any victim who is presumed to be a victim is fully entitled to access services
4.1.3The guidelines clearly set out which organisations have the authority to identify victims of modern slavery0
If yes to 4.1.1, guidelines outline which organisations can or cannot formally identify victims of modern slavery.
If no to 4.1.1, indicator not met.
Examples include a list of approved agencies and NGOs that can identify and certify victims of modern slavery.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – not clear that the action cards make it clear who can refer victims, however previous years' data indicates that there is no formal allocation between who can and who cannot identify victims
4.2.1A “National Referral Mechanism” brings together government and civil society to ensure victims are being referred to services0
There is a National Referral Mechanism for victims of modern slavery
AND it includes government and non-governmental organisations
AND it operated during the period between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
A National Referral Mechanism is a group of approved NGOs and government agencies that refer victims to services.
NOT evidence that victims have been referred without a national system in place.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – no national referral mechanism exists
4.2.2There is evidence that victims are being referred to services using the National Referral Mechanism0
There is evidence that victims are referred through the National Referral Mechanism
AND this has happened once between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – no NRM exists
Milestone 2Criminal justice mechanisms function effectively to prevent modern slavery
IndicatorRating
1.1.1Slavery Convention, 19261
Ratification or succession (denoted by a (d) in brackets) or accession (denoted by an (a) in brackets) of the 1926 Slavery Convention.
NOT signed the 1926 Slavery Convention WITHOUT accession, succession, or ratification.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- the Slavery Convention, 1926 was signed on 11 April 1957
1.1.2Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade, and Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery, 19561
Ratification, or succession (d) or accession (a) of the Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade, and Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery, 1956.
NOT signed the Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade, and Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery, 1956 WITHOUT accession, succession, or ratification.
Researcher NotesIndicator met – Ratified 3 May 1960
1.1.3Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, 2000 1
Ratification, acceptance (A), accession (a), or succession (d) of the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, 2000.
NOT signed the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime 2000, WITHOUT aatification, acceptance, accession, or succession.
Researcher NotesIndicator met – Ratified 23 Sep 2003
1.1.4ILO Abolition of Forced Labour Convention 1957 (No. 105)1
Status must be “In Force” for the Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957 (No. 105)
AND “In Force” as of 30 June 2017.
NOT “In Force” for the ILO Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29).
Researcher NotesIndicator met- The C105- Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957 is in force as of
14 April 1958
1.1.5ILO Domestic Workers Convention, 2011 (No. 189)0
Status must be “In Force” for the Domestic Workers Convention, No, 189
AND “In Force” as of 30 June 2017.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- The C189- Domestic Workers Convention, 2011 is not in force.
1.1.6ILO Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182)1
Status must be “In Force” for the Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (ILO 182)
AND “In Force” as of 30 June 2017.
Researcher NotesIndicator met – Ratified 21 Dec 2000
1.1.7Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict, 20001
Ratification, succession (d), or accession (a) of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict, 2000.
NOT signed the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict, 2000 WITHOUT accession, ratification, or succession.
Researcher NotesIndicator met – Ratified 23 Sep 2003
1.1.8Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, 20001
Ratification, succession (d), or accession (a) of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography 2000.
NOT signed the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, 2000 WITHOUT accession, ratification, or succession.
Researcher NotesIndicator met – Ratified 2 Oct 2001
1.1.9International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families, 19900
Ratification, succession (d) or accession (a) of the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families, 1990.
NOT signed or signed to succeed the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families, 1990 WITHOUT accession, ratification, or succession.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – Not Ratified
1.1.10P029 – Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention, 19301
Status must be “In Force” for the Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 AND “In Force” as of 30 June 2017.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- The Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 is in force as of 09 Nov 2015
1.2.1Human trafficking is criminalised1
Human trafficking is listed as a standalone article in the penal code or criminal code
OR human trafficking is criminalised under a distinct piece of legislation
AND within either the penal code or distinct legislation human trafficking does not require movement of individuals across international borders
AND the legislation covers men, women, and children.
Movement may include cross-border/transnational movement or internal movement such as movement from a rural to urban location.
Definition of trafficking includes action, means, and purpose.
Trafficking in persons shall require action (e.g. recruitment, transportation, transfer, or harbouring), means (e.g. by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud), and purpose (eg. exploitation).
Researcher NotesIndicator met – human trafficking is criminalised in section 224 of the penal code.
1.2.2Slavery is criminalised1
Slavery is criminalised as a distinct crime.
The offence of slavery must include a situation in which the status or condition of a person over whom any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership are exercised. Slavery may be listed as a standalone crime in the penal or criminal code or in trafficking-specific legislation or in another act.
NOT slavery is prohibited in the Constitution.
Researcher NotesIndicator met – section 225 of the penal code separately criminalises slavery
1.2.3Forced labour is criminalised0
Forced labour is criminalised as a distinct crime.
Forced or compulsory labour means all work or service which is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself or herself voluntarily. Does not include compulsory military service, work which forms part of the normal civic obligations of the citizen, or work performed in cases of emergency (such as war, fire, famine, or flood).
The offence of forced labour must include
(1) work performed under the menace of any penalty AND
(2) work for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily.
These two components must be present in order for the indicator to have been met.
Forced labour may be listed as a standalone crime in the penal or criminal code or in trafficking-specific legislation or in another act.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – forced labour is not separately criminalised
1.2.4Use of children in armed conflict is criminalised1
Criminal code or standalone legislation specifically criminalises use of children in armed conflict.
NOT where the age of recruitment is 18 but there is no criminalisation of the use of children in armed forces.
Must cover use of children in state (national army) and non-state armed groups.
Researcher NotesIndicator met – recruitment and use of children for armed services is criminalised in the Penal code.
1.2.5Child prostitution is criminalised1
The penal or criminal code or trafficking legislation includes provisions that it is an offence:
to sell/force a child into prostitution
AND to purchase sexual acts with a child.
NOT met when selling a child is criminalised AND child sex abuse is criminalised (second component must criminalise purchase of sex with a child).
Researcher NotesIndicator met – Child prostitution criminalised. Buying a child for sex is criminalised under article 203 of the Penal Code and selling is criminalised under article 202
1.2.6Forced marriage is criminalised1
Forced marriage is criminalised as a distinct crime, in the penal or criminal code, trafficking-specific legislation, or other act
NOT the legal age of marriage is set at 18.
If kidnapping is required to be present for the crime of forced marriage to occur, this is indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met – forced marriage is criminalised under article 232 of the Penal Code
1.2.7NegativeCriminal laws have disproportionate penalties0
Penalties as laid out in legislation are cruel or inhumane
OR are not sufficient enough to deter future offenders.
This does NOT refer to judicial sentences, rather to the punishments outlined in legislation.
Cruel and inhumane punishments include torture, deliberately degrading punishment, or punishment that is too severe – capital punishment, whipping, or other forms of physical violence. Insufficient punishments would include fines for modern slavery related crimes.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – penalties are not inhumane or insufficient to deter offenders
1.4.1National laws allow victims to participate in the legal system regardless of their role as a witness1
National laws allow victims to participate in the legal system regardless of their role as a witness.
This includes: allowing victims to give evidence (without being called as a witness)
OR providing information on the court processes in languages victims understand
OR allowing victims to inspect and add documents to the file
OR the admission of victim impact statements.
NOT there is evidence or a general statement that victims participate in the criminal justice process as witnesses.
Relevant national laws include criminal procedure code or criminal law (sentencing) acts.
Researcher NotesIndicator met – victims of have a right to legal counsel, right to access documents, amongst others, however they must testify in court unless related to the offender.
1.4.2Law recognizes that victims should not be treated as criminals for conduct that occurred while under control of criminals0
National laws recognise victims are not criminals for conduct during enslavement
AND his must refer to modern slavery crimes, not general provisions in legislation.
Modern slavery crimes are defined as human trafficking, forced labour, slavery, forced marriage, and children in armed conflict.
NOT there is no evidence that victims have been criminalised
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – although there are special circumstances where the prosecution authority can not pursue a prosecution despite evidence of guilt, it is possible the victim could already be arrested and experience secondhand trauma through the legal process by the time this defence is utilised to protect the victim, or the prosecutor discontinues the proceedings under s 205 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
1.4.3Visas to stay in the country are not dependent on victim participation in the court process1
Visas to remain are not tied to a victim’s participation in the court process. For example, visas are awarded to trafficking victims on the basis of humanitarian or personal reasons, not because they have agreed to participate in the court process.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- longer term visas to remain are dependent on court participation.
1.4.5NegativeThere is evidence that victims of modern slavery have been treated as criminals for conduct that occurred while under control of criminals 0
Victims have been arrested for crimes committed while under the control of the person exploiting them
AND this has occurred between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
NOT foreign nationals have been deported OR detained for immigration offences (no visa, overstaying visa, etc.) – this is covered under Milestone 3, 3.2.2.
Examples would be victims have been arrested on prostitution charges or arrested for drug production. If victims are arrested and released as soon as it is realised that they are victims, please rate as indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – previous' years data shows that 'isolated incidents' of victims being detained/fined occur, however given this has continued from 2015-2016 appears that it is not as 'isolated'. However, no data found within the relevant period.
2.1.1Free legal services for victims of modern slavery are made explicit in legislation1
Any type of free legal services or advice exists in legislation, including free legal advice and free legal representation
AND these are either specific to victims of modern slavery
OR victims of modern slavery can access broader legal advice, which is available for all victims of crime.
NOT legal services are available, but not free.
NOT free legal services are available only for citizens, not foreign victims.
NOT free legal services are available for certain types of crime (such as violent crime) and modern slavery is not specified.
NOT free legal services are offered by NGOs, but not made explicit in legislation.
If free legal services exist in legislation AND there is no evidence they are not being used, please rate as indicator met.
If free legal services exist in practice, but there is no evidence of their existence in legislation, please rate as indicator met.
If free legal services are NOT in legislation and no evidence of these being used, please rate as indicator not met.
If free legal services exist in legislation and there is evidence they are not used or are poorly implemented, please rate as indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- legal aid has been available for victims of modern slavery since 2012
2.1.3Witness and victim protection mechanisms are explicit in legislation to ensure that neither witnesses nor victims are intimidated, nor interfered with INSIDE the court1
Government operated or supported witness and victim protection mechanisms exist in legislation so that victims are not intimidated or interfered with INSIDE the court.
Government operated or supported is defined as government run or funded by government or provided with in-kind support from the government.
NOT applicable outside the court room (see Milestone 2, indicator 2.1.4.)
Victim protection mechanisms inside the courtroom refers to provision of video testimony, victims are not cross-examined, and victims are protected from perpetrators.
If witness protection mechanisms exist in legislation AND there is no evidence they are not being used, please rate as indicator met.
If witness protection mechanisms exist in practice, but there is no evidence of their existence in legislation, please rate as indicator met.
If witness protection mechanisms are NOT in legislation and there is no evidence of these being used, please rate as indicator not met.
If witness protection mechanisms exist in legislation and there is evidence they are not used or are poorly implemented, please rate as indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- protection is provided for in the court.
2.1.4Witness and victim protection mechanisms are explicit in legislation to ensure that neither witnesses nor victims are intimidated nor interfered with OUTSIDE the court1
Government operated or supported witness and victim protection mechanisms exist in legislation so that victims are not intimidated or interfered with OUTSIDE the court.
Government operated or supported is defined as government run or funded by government or provided with in-kind support from the government.
NOT applicable inside the court room (see Milestone 2, indicator 2.1.3.)
Witness and victim protection mechanisms include an official witness protection program where individuals are provided with security, new identities, and relocation support, or protection whereby the victim’s identity is not revealed to the public.
If witness protection mechanisms exist in legislation AND there is no evidence they are not being used, please rate as indicator met.
If witness protection mechanisms exist in practice but there is no evidence of their existence in legislation, please rate as indicator met.
If witness protection mechanisms are NOT in legislation and no evidence of these being used, please rate as indicator not met.
If witness protection mechanisms exist in legislation and there is evidence they are not used or are poorly implemented, please rate as indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- witness protection services are available outside the court room since 2012
2.1.5The legal framework supports compensation or restitution for victims of modern slavery 1
The legal framework allows victims of modern slavery to receive compensation for damages incurred as a result of exploitation
OR the legal framework allows victims of modern slavery to receive restitution for damages incurred as a result of exploitation.
Compensation is when a court orders the defendant (perpetrator) to pay the claimant (victim) for his/her loss.
Restitution is when a court orders the defendant (perpetrator) to give up his/her gains to the claimant (victim).
When the compensation and/or restitution is available only for victims of violent crimes, please mark as indicator not met, as this may exclude some victims of modern slavery who are not subject to violent crimes.
If compensation and/or restitution exists in legislation AND there is no evidence they are not being used, please rate as indicator met.
If compensation and/or restitution exists in practice, but there is no evidence of their existence in legislation, please rate as indicator met.
If compensation and/or restitution is NOT in legislation and no evidence of these being used, please rate as indicator not met.
If compensation and/or restitution exists in legislation and there is evidence they are not used or are poorly implemented, please rate as indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met – victims can seek compensation since 2012
2.1.6Child friendly services are provided for in legislation1
Legislation specifies that children require special services during the court case and
NOT there is any evidence of child friendly services being used in court.
Child friendly services include the use of screens or video testimonies, training of judges in child friendly questioning, and the use of one support person or guardian during the court process.
If child friendly services exist in legislation AND there is no evidence they are not being used, please rate as indicator met.
If child friendly services exist in practice but there is no evidence of their existence in legislation, please rate as indicator met.
If child friendly services are NOT in legislation and there is no evidence of these being used, please rate as indicator not met.
If child friendly services exist in legislation and there is evidence they are not used or are poorly implemented, please rate as indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- child friendly services are used throughout the court process since 2012
3.1.1Specialised law enforcement units exist1
Has to be a specialised law enforcement unit or a sub-unit or team within the law enforcement structure that has specialised mandate to conduct investigations into modern slavery,
OR provide specialist support for colleagues
AND this unit is operating since 30 June 2012.
NOT local level anti trafficking coordination bodies.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- specialised police units exist since 2012
3.1.3NegativeUnits do not have necessary resources to be able to operate effectively0
If yes to 3.1.1, these units, sub-units, or teams do not have sufficient budget or operational equipment, or are understaffed. This has been an impact on their ability to function. This lack of resources must have occurred between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – no information found in the relevant period
3.1.4Units have standard operating procedures for modern slavery cases1
If yes to 3.1.1, the unit or team has standard operating procedures (SOPs) for modern slavery cases
AND must be specific to specialist units.
NOT SOPs/guidelines have been produced by an INGO in the last five years (since 30 June 2012) with no evidence of use by specialist unit.
SOPs include for example: clear standardised procedures for use across the unit, including how to liaise with front line officers, on how to conduct risk assessments, interview techniques (covering witnesses, child victims, and use of interpreters), definitions and indicators of modern slavery, victim-centred approaches (understanding of psychological stress and its impact on investigations), case referrals, etc.
SOPs are NOT an internal memo recommending that police focus on modern slavery cases.
SOPs are NOT a booklet handed out to police with indicators of modern slavery.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- police have cards to identify victims, and terms of reference of how to investigate cases provided to them since 2012
3.2.1Training is provided to the judiciary1
Training for the judiciary has taken place on human trafficking and related legislation, victim needs in the court room, basic international legal standards in modern slavery cases, trends in modern slavery in the country, and victim profiles
AND training for judiciary has occurred once since 30 June 2012.
Definition of training includes formal in-person training or an online training program as part of broader curriculum on human rights or other training programs.
Training can be provided by INGOs with government support (support defined as permission, development of the training, or monetary or in-kind support).
NOT training manuals have been developed by INGOs, NGOs.
NOT booklets with description of modern slavery laws have been handed out to judiciary.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- training has been conducted by the Court Administration, although GRETA requests that training is more systematic
3.2.2Training is provided to prosecutors1
Training for prosecutors has taken place on human trafficking and related legislation, victim needs in the court room, basic international legal standards in modern slavery cases, trends in modern slavery in the country, and victim profiles
AND training for prosecutors has occurred once since 30 June 2012.
Definition of training includes formal in-person training or an online training program as part of broader curriculum on human rights or other training programs.
Training can be provided by INGOs with government support (support defined as permission, development of the training, or monetary or in-kind support).
NOT training manuals have been developed by INGOs, NGOs.
NOT booklets with description of modern slavery laws have been handed out to prosecutors.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- training has been provided to prosecutors in 2012
3.2.4Training is systematic and recurrent (as distinct from one-off, isolated)0
If yes to 3.2.1, 3.2.2, OR 3.2.2, training is has occurred at least once to at least one of the above groups (judiciary or prosecutors) since 30 June 2012
AND training has been delivered to a significant proportion of one or both of these groups
OR yes to 3.2.1, 3.2.2, OR 3.2.3 and training has been delivered at least once to BOTH groups (judiciary and prosecutors) since 30 June 2012.
NOT training has been delivered to each of these groups once since 2012.
If no to 3.2.1, AND 3.2.2, then indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- training has been conducted for prosecutors, however no more recent information found to show that this training is systematic (and the TIP report and GRETA reports both recommend systematic training).
3.2.5NegativeJudicial punishments are NOT proportionate to severity of the crime and culpability of the offender. 0
Judicial punishments are either too lenient or too harsh for offenders
AND this has occurred during the period 1 February 2016 to 30 June 2017. Examples of too lenient include giving of fines, suspended sentences, and sentences that are less than the prescribed minimum. Examples of too harsh are corporal punishment and capital punishment.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – no information found in the relevant period, however data from previous years' indicates that sentences have been proportionate
Milestone 3Coordination occurs at the national and regional level, and governments are held to account for their response
IndicatorRating
1.1.1National coordination body exists involving both government and NGOs1
National coordination body on modern slavery (trafficking, slavery, forced labour, children in armed conflict) exists that includes both NGOs and government representatives
AND this group met at least once between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
This body coordinates the whole of the government response to modern slavery.
NOT a National Action Plan.
NOT a group or body that refers victims – this is covered under Milestone 1, 4.2.1.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- National Coordination Unit for victims of Trafficking (KOM) coordinates the government's response
1.2.1National Action Plan exists with clear indicators and allocation of responsibilities1
Any National Action Plan (NAP) on modern slavery, or that covers any component of modern slavery, such as trafficking, forced marriage, forced marriage, children in armed conflict
AND this NAP covers part or all of the period 1 February 2016 to 30 June 2017.
NOT child labour NAPs, or broader human rights NAPs, women empowerment NAPs, unless they include a specific modern slavery section.
NOT regional action plans, such as the Regional Action Plan to End Child Marriage in South Asia (developed with SAARC countries).
Researcher NotesIndicator met- a new National Action Plan was published on 1 December 2016
1.3.2Government routinely uses the National Action Plan as a framework for reporting its actions1
If yes to 1.2.1, the government releases annual reports against the National Action Plan, including process reviews of major anti-slavery initiatives, budgets/expenditures, and implementation plans for the following year/s.
If no to 1.2.1, then this indicator cannot be met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met – KOM produces annual reports on developments in the fight against trafficking ans assistance provided to victims
1.3.5Activities in the National Action Plan are fully funded0
If yes to 1.2.1, there is evidence that there is a budget attached to the NAP and this is fully funded.
Indicator still met if the NAP is part funded by government and part funded by IOs or NGOs, but that all activities are funded.
NOT the activities are costed, but it is unclear where this money is coming from OR there are reports of significant gaps in funding that are not plugged by IOs, NGOs or other agencies.
If no to 1.2.1, then this indicator cannot be met.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – 1.2.1. not met
2.1.1Independent entity to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of National Action Plan exists0
An independent entity is established to monitor the activities of the government in relation to its anti-modern slavery efforts.
This body can be outside the NAP and does not have to focus solely on modern slavery.
Independent entity can be an independent statutory body or individual or other third party that DOES NOT implement the government response to modern slavery. Examples would include a Human Rights Commission or National Rapporteur.
NOT regional entities that inspect government responses, such as Group of Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (GRETA) in Europe.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- previous' years data shows that no independent monitoring group exists. No more recent data found.
3.1.1The government is involved in a regional response1
The government is part of a regional response.
A relevant regional body includes:
– A body with more than two country representatives as members of the group, and
– A focus on some form of modern slavery.
The government must have signed onto, or have agreed to abide by, the shared values and objectives developed by the group (i.e. a code of conduct, an MoU on proposed outcomes, etc.).
Researcher NotesIndicator met- CBSS, COE and OSCE have taken some steps to combat modern slavery in the last year.
3.1.3Agreements exist between the government and countries of origin and/or destination to collaborate on modern slavery issues1
Agreements exist between governments of countries of origin and/or destination on modern slavery issues to collaborate on modern slavery issues.
NOT labour migration agreements (covered under M3 3.2.6).
NOT evidence of repatriation (covered under M3 3.2.1).
Researcher NotesIndicator met- an agreement on assisting the victims of human trafficking and processing cases of cross-border trafficking in humans between Estonia and Norway exists. An agreement on creating a Task Force against Trafficking in Human Beings (TF-THB) between Denmark and Norway exists. The Norwegian government closely collaborates with all EU partners to investigate THB crimes
3.2.1The government cooperates with the government of the home country to facilitate repatriation1
The government cooperates with home country for voluntary repatriation of foreign nationals.
This could include repatriation mediated by IOM (MUST have evidence that police or government authorities refer victims to IOM)
AND this has occurred since 30 June 2012.
NOT evidence of deportation.
Repatriation refers to the voluntary return of individuals to their home country with their consent.
Deportation refers to the removal of individuals from a country without their consent.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- voluntary repatriation occurs through IOM since 2012
3.2.4NegativeForeign victims are detained and/or deported for immigration violations0
Foreign victims are detained in detention facilities or deported for immigration violations. Can include instances where victims are detained for a breach of visa conditions OR instances where foreign victims are deported to countries of origin without access to assistance.
This occurred between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
Note: if victims are arrested for crimes committed while enslaved, please refer to Milestone 2, 1.4.2
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – no information found within the relevant period, however data from previous years' shows that victims have been detained in the past.
3.2.6Agreements exist between countries on labour migration, which provide protection for labour migrants0
These agreements provide protection for labour migrants, NOT agreements regarding number of labour migrants sent/received. For countries that are part of the EU, membership is not sufficient to offer protection. Instead, please see whether national legislation has been harmonised with EU requirements under EU law. See Group of Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (GRETA) reports.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- no information on protection mechanisms in bilateral agreement with Philippines. As a member of Schengen, Norway provides protection to EU nationals
Milestone 4Risk factors, such as attitudes, social systems, and institutions that enable modern slavery are addressed
IndicatorRating
1.1.1Government facilitates or funds non-prevalence research on modern slavery1
Government funds or has been actively involved in research on any type of modern slavery, including responses to modern slavery, and the attitudes, social systems and institutions that place people at risk of modern slavery
AND this has occurred at least once since 30 June 2012.
Active involvement is defined as development of the research, participation in the research, or monetary or in-kind support.
Modern slavery includes trafficking, forced labour, slavery, worst forms of child labour, forced marriage, and use of child soldiers.
NOT civil society conducts research without government involvement.
NOT government conducts research on child labour.
NOT government conducts prevalence research.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- the government has conducted research on modern slavery issues since 2012. Research is primarily conducted by the Fafo Institute for Labour and Social Research and the Ministry of Justice and Public Security
1.1.2Government facilitates or funds research on prevalence or estimation studies of modern slavery0
The government funds or has been actively involved in prevalence or estimation studies of modern slavery.
AND this has occurred at least once since 30 June 2012.
Active involvement is defined as development of the research, participation in the research, or monetary or in-kind support.
Modern slavery includes trafficking, forced labour, slavery, worst forms of child labour, forced marriage, and use of child soldiers.
The research must provide estimations of the number of people in modern slavery.
NOT civil society conducts research without government involvement.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – research has been conducted since 2012, but not prevalence research
1.1.3Government interventions that aim to address modern slavery are evidence-based1
There is evidence that government interventions or programs are based on strategies or theories of change identified by research
AND this has occurred since 30 June 2012.
Evidence can include a broader government strategy that incorporates modern slavery research, the National Action Plan incorporates modern slavery research or that the National Action Plan or strategy is reviewed in line with recent modern slavery research.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- evidence that research is conducted to inform policy
1.2.1Awareness campaigns target specific known risks of modern slavery1
Any awareness campaign implemented by the government that provides detailed information on how to avoid the risks of modern slavery
AND has run at least once since 30 June 2012.
Campaign can be implemented by the government with a partner NGO
OR funded by the government and implemented by an NGO.
These campaigns can include domestic violence, forced marriage, child marriage, the worst forms of child labour, child soldiers, and risky migration practices.
NOT an awareness-raising, counter-trafficking campaign run by an international organisation.
NOT promotion of the hotline – this is covered under Milestone 1, 1.1.1.
Researcher NotesIndicator met – awareness campaigns have been conducted since 2012
1.3.2The government conducts labour inspections in the informal sector to identify cases of modern slavery1
The government funds labour inspections that are conducted with specific intent of finding modern slavery victims in the informal sector.
Government funding is defined as monetary or in-kind support.
Informal sector includes workers in unregulated industries such as sex work, brick kilns, agriculture, fishing, and domestic work
AND these inspections have occurred since 30 June 2012.
NOT private companies conduct their own inspections.
NOT labour inspectors are trained on modern slavery – this is covered under Milestone 1, 2.3.1.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- labour inspectors are trained and have conducted searches since 2012
1.3.3Affordable health care for vulnerable populations exists1
Affordable health care includes the presence of state health care schemes, community health schemes, or financial assistance focused on providing access to health care for vulnerable groups.
Health care is available for all and does not discriminate based on gender, ethnicity, religious background, or geographic region.
NOT health care is available for victims of modern slavery – this is covered under Milestone 1, 3.1.4.
For example, if health care is too costly, thereby excluding certain groups, or health care is too centralised, thereby excluding certain geographical regions, please rate as indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- affordable health care exists for all in Norway.
1.3.4Public primary education is available for all children regardless of ethno-cultural or religious background1
Public primary education system exists.
Education is available for all children and does not discriminate based on gender, ethnicity, religious background, or geographic region.
For example, if primary education is too costly, thereby excluding attendance by certain groups of children, or education is not available to certain groups (such as Roma) please rate as indicator not met.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- primary education is free and compulsory for all
1.4.1National laws criminalise corruption in the public sector1
Public corruption is criminalised in legislation.
Public sector includes government officials, including police, immigration, and border guards. Corruption includes, at a minimum, bribery of officials. Please refer to legislation, not to instances of combating corruption.
Researcher NotesIndicator met-corruption is criminalised by Sections 276a and 276b of the Penal Code.
1.4.3NegativeReports of individual officials’ complicity in modern slavery cases have not been investigated0
Any reports of individual officials’ complicity or corruption in modern slavery cases between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
Individual officials include: government officials, police, immigration officials, border guards, and labour inspectors.
Excludes consular staff (covered by Milestone 4, indicator 1.7.5)
MUST be related to modern slavery crimes (trafficking, forced labour, slavery, forced marriage, use of child soldiers, and worst forms of child labour).
NOT evidence of general corruption of law enforcement.
MUST refer to more than one report of complicity within the reporting period AND no steps have been taken to investigate these reports.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- corruption has occurred rarely and it has been investigated when it has occurred
1.5.1Birth registration systems exist1
The government funds or supports birth registration systems that cover the entire population.
Can include systems which are implemented or funded by INGOs, but with government support.
Government support is defined as development of the birth registration system, participation in the system, or monetary or in-kind support.
Covering the entire population refers to the percentage of people who are registered. Indicator is not met if less than 95 percent of the population is registered, OR specific groups are missing.
See UNICEF statistics and supplement with additional research on missing vulnerable populations. Vulnerable populations can include ethnic, cultural, or religious groups whose members do not have equal access to birth registration.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- birth registration is available for 100% of the population.
1.5.2Systems are in place to allow asylum seekers to seek protection0
There are policies and procedures in place that enable asylum seekers to access basic support and protection within a country’s borders.
Services may be provided by IOs/NGOs with government support.
Government support is defined as development of the asylum seeker system, participation in the system, or monetary or in-kind support.
NOT asylum seekers are detained without access to services.
NOT asylum seekers are deported without their claims being assessed.
NOT asylum seekers claims are assessed outside of the country where they sought asylum.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- evidence of deportation and detainment. Asylum protections exist in law, however, there restrictions have been placed on access to asylum in Norway in recent years. Children seeking asylum have disappeared reception centres
1.6.3Laws or policies state that private recruitment fees are paid by the employer, not the employee0
Government legislation or policies state that recruitment fees payable to recruitment agencies are not charged to the employee (i.e. are paid by the employer, not employee). Please check Labour Code or Employment Act for this information
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- no information found
1.6.5Labour laws extend to everyone, including migrant workers, domestic workers, and those in the fishing and construction sectors.0
The legal definition of an employee includes all vulnerable workers, such as domestic workers, migrant workers, construction workers, maritime workers, etc. If the jurisdiction does not have a generic definition of an employee or a labour code, the information can come from NGOs, related legislation, or reports.
NOT domestic workers are not explicitly mentioned in legislation.
NOT labour protections do not cover fishermen in territorial waters.
This indicator does not extend to army, judiciary and civil service – if these are NOT included, and all other groups are included, this is still indicator met.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- labour laws do not extend to fishing, hunting and shipping and do not fully cover domestic work
1.6.7NegativePatterns of abuse of labour migrants are institutionalised, or systematic and unchecked0
Abuse of migrant workers is institutionalised, or systematic and not addressed.
Institutionalised means that these practices are part of government policy, or that these patterns of abuse are systematic, and the government is taking little if any action to address this.
Patterns of abuse includes multiple instances of the following: high recruitment fees, or high interest rates on fees making it impossible to pay them back, or withheld passports is a common occurrence by the majority of employers, or most workers have restrictions placed on their movement by their employers
AND this occurred between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
NOT instances of these abuses are reported, but the government is taking action against these.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – no information found
1.6.9NegativeThere are laws or policies that prevent or make it difficult for workers to leave abusive employers without risk of loss of visa and deportation0
Any current specific government policy or law that leads to loss of visa or deportation of migrant workers (or specific groups of migrant workers, such as domestic workers) for leaving abusive employers
AND current defined as operating between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
NOT there is evidence of victims being deported for breach of visa conditions, but this does not occur as a direct result of government policy – this is covered under Milestone 3, indicator 3.2.4.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – possible to get working visas which are not tied to an employer and residence permits do not depend on staying with one employer
1.7.1Government provides training on modern slavery for its consular staff 1
Government provides training for its embassy or consular staff before departure for a posting or during a posting
AND this has occurred once since 1 February 2012.
Definition of training includes formal in-person training or part of an online training program as part of broader curriculum on human rights or other training programs.
Training can be provided by INGOs with government support (support defined as permission, development of the training, or monetary or in-kind support).
NOT training manuals have been developed by INGOs, NGOs.
NOT booklets with indicators of trafficking have been handed out to embassy staff.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- training has been provided to diplomatic and consular staff since 2012
1.7.2Government provides identification documents and support travel arrangements for citizen return1
Any citizen found to be exploited overseas can obtain documents from their own country or be facilitated with travel back to their country by their own government. These documents are normally given by a citizen’s embassies or consulates
AND this has occurred at least once since 30 June 2012.
This information can be found in modern slavery legislation, or on Ministry/Department of Foreign Affairs websites.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- govt does provide travel documents for citizen return
1.7.5NegativeDiplomatic staff are not investigated for alleged complicity in modern slavery cases or abuse of victims0
Diplomatic/embassy staff are complicit in the exploitation of nationals or abuse those who seek assistance at the embassy and no investigations have taken place
AND this has occurred between 1 February 2016 and 30 June 2017.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met – no information found
1.8.1NegativeState-sanctioned forced labour exists0
Any form of state-sanctioned labour, where the government forced the whole population, or segments of it, to work under threat of penalty, and for which work people have not offered themselves voluntarily. Excludes compulsory military service, work which forms part of normal civil obligations of the citizen, or work performed in cases of emergency (such as war, fire, famine or flood).
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- no evidence of state imposed labour found
Milestone 5Government and business stop sourcing goods and services produced by forced labour
IndicatorRating
1.1.1Guidelines exist for public procurement officials0
The government has drafted guidelines or an internal memo for public procurement officials that outline standards and/or operating procedures to prevent the purchase of public goods or services that involve modern slavery. These can be general guidelines on human rights that include sub-sections on modern slavery.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- there is a Guide to Socially Responsible Public Procurement which aims to help public procurers to set and monitor standards for decent working conditions at productions sites, which references the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Not specific to modern slavery
1.1.2Public procurement policies and systems exist to minimise the risk of governments purchasing products tainted by forced labour1
The government drafts and implements public procurement policies and standards that explicitly prohibit engaging businesses suspected of using forced labour or purchasing products that were made using forced labour.
These policies can include inserting clauses in public contracts prohibiting the use of forced labour, directing that purchasing decisions not be made on price alone, outlining steps to be taken should a contractor be found to use forced labour, or requiring government contractors over a certain value to maintain compliance plans.
Researcher NotesIndicator met- social considerations, including fundamental workers rights and human rights, are taken into account public contracts and subcontracts, including penalties for non- compliance.
1.1.3Annual reports on government action to prevent use of forced labour in public procurement are produced and publicly available0
The government releases reports on activities taken to prevent use of forced labour in public procurement
AND this has to have occurred since 30 June 2012.
OR if the policy has been adopted since 1 February 2015, it is enough that reporting is stipulated as part of regulating compliance.
The report can be on human rights but include a sub-section on modern slavery.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- no evidence that annual reports on government action to prevent use of forced labour in public procurement have been produced
1.1.4The government has provided training to public procurement officials on modern slavery0
The government has provided training to procurement officials on what is modern slavery, how it is relevant to their role, and on existing government policies and their implementation.
This training is provided face-to-face, or through online training modules, and has occurred at least once since 30 June 2012.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- no evidence that government has provided training to public procurement officials on modern slavery
1.1.5There is evidence that the government has taken remedial action where forced labour has been discovered 0
There is evidence that the government has worked with contractors that have been identified as having issues with use of forced labour to implement corrective action plans
OR where the use of forced labour is prevalent and the contractor is unwilling to work with the government, there is evidence that the government has cancelled the contract
AND this has occurred since 30 June 2012.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- no evidence that any remediation has taken place
2.1.1Laws or policies require businesses to report on their actions to implement risk minimisation policies0
Legislation or policies require business to report on their actions to minimise risk of forced labour in their supply chain (e.g. the UK Modern Slavery Act requires businesses earning more than GBP36 million annually to report on their actions to combat modern slavery).
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- Norway has not yet transposed Directive 2014/95/EU into domestic legislation
2.1.2Governments have identified high-risk sectors and have taken action to work with these sectors to eradicate modern slavery0
The government has collaborated with businesses to identify high-risk sectors and set up national sector-specific initiatives that support businesses to tackle modern slavery. These initiatives can be broader initiatives that cover sustainability, health and safety, etc., but must include some elements of tackling modern slavery.
For example, the sustainable textile partnership in Germany.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- no evidence the government has identified high risk sectors and taken action to work with these sectors to eradicate modern slavery
2.1.3Laws or policies allow governments to create a public list of businesses that have been found to tolerate slavery in their supply chains0
The government has worked with businesses and NGOs to create a public list of businesses that have been found to tolerate forced labour in their supply chains AND/OR these businesses are prevented from accessing public funds. For example, the “dirty list” in Brazil.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- no evidence of laws or policies that allow the government to create a public list of businesses who have been found to tolerate slavery in their supply chains
2.1.4Governments implement a responsible investment reporting requirement for investment funds and banks headquartered in their country to ensure that investment does not support modern slavery0
Investment funds and banks headquartered in the country MUST report on modern slavery risk in investments
AND reporting must occur at least every two years.
If policy is in place, there MUST be evidence that this has occurred since 30 June 2012 OR if the policy has just been adopted, it is enough that reporting is stipulated as part of regulating compliance.
NOTE: There must be explicit mention of modern slavery NOT investment funds or banks have corporate social responsibility policies that require them to report on human rights UNLESS modern slavery forms part of this reporting.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- no evidence of the government implementing a responsible investment reporting requirement for investment funds and banks found
2.1.5Laws or policies prevent the import of goods and services made with forced labour0
The government has prohibited the import of goods and services made with forced labour. For example, the US Tariff Act.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- no evidence of laws or policies preventing the import of goods or services produced with forced labour
2.1.6Laws are in place that make it a criminal offence for company directors or companies who fail to prevent modern slavery and fail to undertake reasonable due diligence in first tier supply chain.0
Directors can be charged and prosecuted for slavery in first tier supply chains where it can be shown that due diligence has not occurred. This indicator measures the existence of this provision in legislation.
Researcher NotesIndicator not met- no evidence of criminal offence for company directors whose companies have been found to use forced labour in their direct supply chains